The Convention does not empower the Conference to terminate an appointment once made, and even if such power is somehow to be assumed, it can only be on the basis that the power given to the Conference under paragraph 43 of Article VIII can be assumed to extend to termination of an appointment. But if the power to dismiss rests on paragraph 43, obviously the restrictions in paragraph 43 would apply. Accordingly, any decision to terminate, in order to be effective, would need the prior recommendation of the Council.

In these circumstances, the most that the Conference can do would be to adopt a decision requesting the Director General to resign voluntarily. Any decision adopted by the Conference going beyond that point would be a nullity – in the same way as would be a decision to extend his term for life.

VI. IS SUPPORT BY THE US NECESSARY?
It is significant that Canada’s explanation for supporting the US offers only one reason, namely the importance of avoiding a long and damaging leadership debate. This statement, in its context, can only mean that Canada believes that US support for the Director General is essential and that the Convention cannot be administered except on terms acceptable to the US. Possibly, the same view would explain the support given by other countries for the US position.