HUD Landlord and Mortgage Banking Business:
I have described a pattern of institutional corruption between Harvard and HUD similar to what Harvard Watch described between Harvard and Enron. US taxpayers and communities lost while Harvard's endowment, its network of investors and Harvard government contracts and appointees benefited from their ability to influence policy and budgets. This includes Harvard Kennedy School promotion of a housing program that builds housing for $150,000-250,000 per unit in neighborhoods where single-family homes could be rehabbed and sold for $25-75,000.
Harvard’s HUD company, NHP, and Harvard affiliated administration officials failed to embrace or were opposed to numerous innovations to improve return on investment to both taxpayers and communities at HUD.[9]

- Can you explain the relationship of NHP’s lobbying efforts to adopt policies that have been much more expensive for communities and taxpayers with Capricorn’s and Harvard’s stock profits on the sale of NHP to AIMCO and the sale of WMF, the largest FHA/HUD multifamily mortgage broker, to Prudential?
- Was NHP’s opposition to HUD loan sales (privatizations at full market price) driven by the fact that Harvard Endowment and its investments were engineering government policy world wide to arrange privatizations at below market price and deregulation at above market prices globally?

Russia:
Anne Williamson has documented a pattern of institutional corruption by Harvard University to use its academic resources and reputation to promote bid rigging and insider trading on Russian privatizations - advantaging Harvard's Endowment, its network of investors and government contract business.