Speaking of the Mike Vreeland Case, where a warning letter was not allowed to be delivered until AFTER September 11, Mr. Ruppert notes:
“… we have done a significant amount of research showing that many of those entries are related to 9-11. Only a portion of it has been published as yet. Both Vreeland’s mother and his attorneys, former Canadian federal prosecutors of impeccable reputation, have all said consistently that, as Sept 11th approached, Vreeland’s sense of urgency increased dramatically and that he kept warning his mother, who was scheduled to go to New York in early September to, “stay out of tall buildings.” Previous stories FTW has published leave no doubt that both Vreeland and his attorneys knew that he was referring to the events that ultimately occurred on September 11th. He has never said and I have never said that he knew the exact date in advance. Read my interview with him!
“The warning letter has a context which you have deliberately chosen to ignore. That context has been established in several FTW stories including interviews with Vreeland and his attorneys as well as a court record documenting numerous rebuffed attempts to reach Canadian and U.S. intelligence officials which increased in both frequency and urgency before the attacks. To take the letter out of that context and to refuse to examine our reporting is worse than disingenuous. It is dishonest and unethical.
“… we have done a significant amount of research showing that many of those entries are related to 9-11. Only a portion of it has been published as yet. Both Vreeland’s mother and his attorneys, former Canadian federal prosecutors of impeccable reputation, have all said consistently that, as Sept 11th approached, Vreeland’s sense of urgency increased dramatically and that he kept warning his mother, who was scheduled to go to New York in early September to, “stay out of tall buildings.” Previous stories FTW has published leave no doubt that both Vreeland and his attorneys knew that he was referring to the events that ultimately occurred on September 11th. He has never said and I have never said that he knew the exact date in advance. Read my interview with him!
“The warning letter has a context which you have deliberately chosen to ignore. That context has been established in several FTW stories including interviews with Vreeland and his attorneys as well as a court record documenting numerous rebuffed attempts to reach Canadian and U.S. intelligence officials which increased in both frequency and urgency before the attacks. To take the letter out of that context and to refuse to examine our reporting is worse than disingenuous. It is dishonest and unethical.